Other versions:

(Verbatim name)

ID

(Catalog Number)

ORG

DES

Invalid DOI was provided, please try again

XML
PDF
 
 
Twitter
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Notify a colleague
  • ContentsContents
  • Article InfoArticle Info
  • CiteCite
  • MetricsMetrics
  • CommentComment
  • RelatedRelated
  • FigsFigs
  • TabsTabs
  • DataData
  • RefsRefs
  • CitedCited
  • Article title
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • Introduction
  • Study area
  • Methods
    • Field sampling and literature data
    • Environmental variables
    • Phytosociological analysis
    • Ecological analysis
  • Results
    • Proposed syntaxonomic scheme
    • Description of distinguished groups of relevés
      • Group 1 ‒ Geranio phaei-Urticetum dioicae
      • Group 2 ‒ Petasitetum hybridi Imchenetzky 1926
      • Group 3 ‒ Chaerophyllo hirsuti-Petasitetum albi Sýkora et Hadač 1984
      • Group 4 ‒ Prenanthetum purpureae
      • Group 5 ‒ Rumicetum alpini Beger 1922
      • Group 6 ‒ Poo chaixii-Deschampsietum cespitosae Pawłowski et Walas 1949
      • Group 7 ‒ Crepido conyzifoliae-Calamagrostietum villosae (Zlatník 1925) Jeník 1961
      • Group 8 ‒ Athyrietum filicis-feminae Wendelberger in Höfler et Wendelberger 1960
      • Group 9 ‒ Cicerbitetum alpinae
    • Ecological differentiation
  • Discussion
    • Delimitation of the Mulgedio-Aconitetea against other classes
    • Subdivision of the Mulgedio-Aconitetea into orders and alliances
    • Justification and circumscription of associations
  • Conclusions
  • Data availability
  • Author contributions
  • Acknowledgments
  • References
  • E-mail and ORCID
  • Supplementary material
  • Supplementary materials
Subscribe to email alerts for current Article's categories
Powered by